Social media as a battleground for energy projects

Tom Liacas —  October 30, 2012 — 5 Comments

Clean, plentiful, cheap and not in our back yard! Taken together, the voice of public groups mobilizing on energy issues is rising in volume and power, creating a major headache for the energy industry. And now, with the help of social media, public mobilization is lightning-fast. This instant groundswell of grassroots action determines how mainstream media will cover the issue and often forces political action. In short, it generates often-repeated #fail situations for energy players such as the others I have covered in the B2C sector previously.

Recently, I called out on LinkedIn to get some case studies from energy professionals and I thank those that gave me a hand! This post is a selection of recent social media mobilizations against energy projects and how industry has chosen to respond (when it responds at all).

Wind Power Opposition:

I want to start with this because it seems counter-intuitive. Who’s opposed to clean energy, after all? Well, it seems that wind projects are drawing more and more heat from local resident associations who do not want turbines close by. This reminds me of the energy industry view of public desires: B.A.N.A.N.A. or Build Absolutely Nothing Anywhere Near Anything. I hear from Dawn in North Carolina that such opposition has recently entirely shut down a wind project. Here are two other examples, one from Massachusetts and another from Ontario.

http://www.saveoursound.org
http://ontario-wind-resistance.org

Oil Company Attacks:

There are surely dozens of examples here, the most recent of which is the dual campaign against Shell waged by Greenpeace and the Yes Men. The spoof postcard campaign slamming Shell’s Arctic exploration plans sure got a lot of attention! I have written on this in a previous blog post linked here.

Anti Shale Gas and Fracking :

Shale gas is causing an energy revolution in the U.S and, as it is a new technology that captures the public imagination (not in a good way), opposition abounds online. Fears about water contamination, earthquakes and ravaged countrysides make for viral content and those opposed to this industry are also very advanced content creators.

The website below is probably the best illustration of the messaging and content quality produced by the anti-fracking movement:

http://artistsagainstfracking.com

Energy Industry Responses:

The energy industry is entering social media at different speeds. I have personally approached the wind power sector to offer assistance on this but have been told that they would like to ‘wait and see’ how things develop. On the oil and gas side of things, where opposition has been more intense, there is more activity. Here are some highlights:

  • Already back in 2009, Shell was hosting live webchats (Shell Dialogues) and inviting NGOs to discuss their concerns directly with Shell reps. Archives of these chats are hosted online here.
  • Shale gas player Chesapeake Energy has begun responding to opponents directly through a blog/twitter strategy. An article on this from the Nieman Lab on journalism is linked here.
  • Energy in Depth, a U.S. industry-funded initiative operated by FTI Consulting, runs a series of blogs, twitter and facebook accounts  featuring content that aggressively refutes activist and journalist views against shale gas development.
  • Michael Binnion, CEO of Canada’s Questerre Energy, is an advanced social media user, writing in his own voice and taking on hard questions and opponents directly through his blog and twitter account.
  • And finally, Shaletalk, a project I have personally helped get off the ground, funded by the Canadian Association of Petroleum Producers invites public and industry to exchange Q+A on shale gas through a blog platform, a Facebook Page and Twitter account.

This is only meant to be a partial list. Other examples to share? Please add them in the comments section!

Tom Liacas

Tom Liacas

Posts Twitter Google+

An M.A. graduate in Media Studies, Tom Liacas is a senior Online Reputation Strategist who cut his teeth creating and managing networked campaigns well before the term 'social media' existed. Innovating in the trenches of digital activist groups such as Indymedia and Adbusters in the 90s, Tom gained a deep understanding of what makes corporations and governments vulnerable to social media crisis and, conversely, how to adapt their communications to create productive exchanges with their stakeholders. In his career so far, Tom has personally overseen the sale, design and management of over 2 million dollars’ worth of social media projects for clients in the Fortune 500, the resource and energy sectors and the public sector.
  • Stephane Perrault

    Hello Tom,
    As far as I am concerned (in Québec), There was other energy projects that were contested by environemental and local communities groups. I can thing of the Rabaska LNG termeinal project in Lévis and the “Le Suroit” gas power plant project of Hydro-Québec in Beauharnois.
    I do not know if they are relevant for your project but both oe these recent projects were abandonned by the promoters.
    I hope this could help you and I am really looking forward to meet with you again soon.
    Stéphane

    • http://twitter.com/TomLiacas Tom Liacas

      Hi Stéphane, thanks for joining the discussion! Those are two good examples of recent project stall here. I will look to see if there were significant online actions to support these. If you have links pls share!

  • http://twitter.com/tautechnical Dawn Santoianni

    Tom, you can also also add solar to the list. In Sacramento, California plans for solar panels on a closed municipal landfill faced opposition from environmental groups concerned with the impact on feeding area for hawks. There are other examples across the west, particularly in California.

    The Daily Climate had an article on “The new look of NIMBYism” which discusses the impacts on renewable projects:
    http://wwwp.dailyclimate.org/tdc-newsroom/2012/01/green-nimbyism

    My observation is that much of social media generated opposition to renewable projects fall into the “one issue” category, i.e. noise or bird kills for wind, habitat for solar. While opposition to fossil projects is based on much broader issues such as pollution and health impacts.

    Thanks for the great compilation of references and insights!

    • http://twitter.com/TomLiacas Tom Liacas

      Hi Dawn, really interesting that NIMBYism is turning against renewable projects. On some issues the Not In My Back Yard gang join larger coalitions and cloak themselves behind environmental concerns. In the cases you present, it’s clear that this kind of local resistance is not necessarily progressive, it is rather apolitical after all.

  • http://twitter.com/TomLiacas Tom Liacas

    Another interesting series of social media oil and gas case studies from an industry journal out west: http://www.pipelinenewsnorth.ca/article/20121114/PIPELINE0118/311149999/-1/pipeline/tweeting-the-way